Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nix v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm
For example, in Italian Colors Rest. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:19 pm
In the case of a sale of joint venture property by one joint adventurer, the other is entitled to an accounting on principal and interest profit, if any, received by the seller on the purchase money mortgage received when the joint venture property was liquidated (Burtell v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
[iv] See, Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:36 am
In Pinn v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
I was thinking about that, and the fact that not every horse could have taken Mystik Dan’s remarkable inside run to a win in the Kentucky Derby, while still musing on the summary judgment ruling in Sellers v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC notes that a relevant product market is properly drawn if a “single firm . . . seeking to maximize profits controlled all sellers of a set of products or services and likely would undertake a small but significant and non-transitory increase in price or other worsening of terms” (SSNIPT). [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
