Search for: "Sens v. Sens"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm
The bill’s sponsor, state Sen. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am
Lawmakers have also put pricing algorithm on the spotlight: As one example, on January 20, 2024, Sen. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
That bill, however, never won the support of Sen. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:00 am
Fort de l’analyse de réunions et documents de l’OIM, l’ouvrage révèle comment divers fonctionnaires internationaux, diplomates et experts ont formulé, diffusé, matérialisé ou encore contesté la gestion migratoire. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
The GG v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Sen. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:08 pm
In McCall v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
An excerpt about the facts: After Iran launched a barrage of missiles at Israel on April 13 in its first direct military assault on the country, Sen. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
Sen. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Não se trata de inferência factual ou indutiva nem de deduções baseadas em leis universais, mas de procedimento paradigmático — pois paradigmática foi a fotografia para a epistemologia benjaminiana da História.6 O paradigma não é um atributo ou parte de um fenômeno, mas, desde Platão, uma “relação” entre sensível e mental: “a relação… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:49 am
But I think she really has to weigh the competing factors,” said Sen. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
According to The Hill: "Sen. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
For example, Sen. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Soon enough, I see Sen. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:00 pm
La décision Le TAT confirme que le congédiement du Plaignant est illégal au sens de l’article 122 de la LNT, en ce qu’il a effectivement été l’objet d’une sanction imposée de façon concomitante à l’exercice d’un droit protégé. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In 2001, Sen. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Ralph Norman and Sen. [read post]