Search for: "Settles v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 17,345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Second, since the consumer was not a party to the proceedings, the court could not consider the consumer’s intention to rely, after having been informed by that court, on the unfair and non-binding nature of the clause at issue. 2.2 Legal background According to the settled case law of the ECJ (e.g. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
That case was settled in 2023. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:40 am
The trial court granted summary judgment on this claim in favor of the State, but the Court of Appeals brings the case back, and unless the case settles, it looks like this case will proceed to trial.The case is Brandon v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:56 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
It is settled that speech can be effectively limited by the exercise of the taxing power. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
So that’s settled. [read post]
