Search for: "Shah v. Shah"
Results 1 - 20
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am
Moreover, the complaint fails to allege fraud with any particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; see Browne v Lyft, Inc., 219 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2023]; Shah v Mitra, 171 ADed 971, 976 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
Last week in the courts On Monday 10 June 2024, there was an application hearing in Shah v Imran and others QB-2021-001140. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Trump by Seth Barrett Tillman Podcast: Protecting Cultural Heritage The Just Security Podcast: Protecting Cultural Heritage During Armed Conflict by Paras Shah (@pshah518) and Audrey Balliette interview with Bonnie Docherty (@bonnie_docherty) The post Digest of Recent Articles on Just Security (June 10-June 14) appeared first on Just Security. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am
Europe The case of Danilet v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am
Criminal Responsibility for Organized Armed Groups by Rogier Bartels (@RogierBartels) Immigration Law and Policy Why Trump v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
This incident prompted Shah to petition the Calcutta High Court. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
Shah, No. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
Enforcement Highlights: Ongoing Enforcement Sweeps as an Efficient and Effective Means of Changing Behavior Both Deputy Director Wadhwa and Associate Regional Director Tejal Shah spoke of sweeps as an effective tool to shape market behavior, particularly noting the industry’s widespread reaction to the off-channel communications sweep and resulting remedial efforts. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Shah v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:52 am
Kinjal Shah, Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas Chair and General Partner at Blockchain Capital, said, “Texas should move forward and lead by example with sensible crypto policies that protect consumers and investors, and foster innovation. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Russia and South Africa v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Hathaway (@oonahathaway), Yuval Shany (@yuvalshany1), Paras Shah (@pshah518) and Clara Apt (@claraapt25) (January 26, 2024) Top Experts’ Views of Int’l Court of Justice Ruling on Israel Gaza Operations (South Africa v Israel, Genocide Convention Case) By Just Security (January 26, 2024) Unpacking the Int’l Court of Justice Judgment in South Africa v Israel (Genocide Case) By Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) and Siven Watt (@SivenWatt) (January 26, 2024)… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:24 am
Israel-Hamas War Between Rhetoric and Effects: The ICJ Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:53 am
Turning to case law, the Appellate Division relied on Shah v. [read post]