Search for: "Sharp v. Commonwealth"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 6:51 am
” Burd v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Super. 2020) citing Sharp v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Coop., 845 F.3d 1135, 1144 (11th Cir. 2017) (quoting In re Commonwealth’s Motion to Appoint Counsel Against or Directed to Def. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Kwass v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 8 December 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Hwang v Kim [2021] EWHC 3327 (QB). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Kwass v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Millett v Corbyn, heard 16 March 2021 (Vos MR, Sharp P, Warby LJ). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
It is hoped that the Law Commission will seek to build upon existing solutions for offline and online contracts, rather than seeking to draw a sharp distinction between ‘smart’ and ‘backward’ contracts. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
(This is the deep meaning of the fact, for example, that four of the American states—Massachusetts, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky (originally, of course, part of Virginia)—styled themselves as “commonwealths,” i.e., communities organized around the seeking of a common good. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
See Commonwealth Sci. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:59 am
” The pandemic has inflicted sharp political costs for some regional leaders. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
Venezuela has reportedly initiated talks with China over financial support to cope with the sharp drop in oil prices and the arrival of COVID-19, with 91 cases confirmed in the country on 24 March. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
”Averett v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
On 25 March 2019, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism On 27 March 2019, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Monir v Wood. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
