Search for: "Shelby v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
They rely on the equal sovereignty principle, which the Supreme Court applied in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Shelby Farmers Mutual, 679 N.W.2d 407, 412 (Minn. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 12:45 pm
There has been a lot written about equal sovereignty since the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Huff v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm
Bartlett (2013), Justice Ginsburg's dissent in Shelby County (2013), Justice Breyer's dissent in Jennings v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:00 am
City of Shelby, 574 U.S. 10 (2014). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:37 am
Shelby Cnty. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
See Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Regarding diminished voting rights of poor people and minorities, the article discusses decisions on the Voting Rights Act of 1965, including Shelby County v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Wiggins v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Shelby v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
