Search for: "Shields v. Murray"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:21 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a landmark whistleblower case Murray v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:28 am
Peeples, 270 S.C. 116 (1978); Murray v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
See Mapp v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Katelyn Polantz, Sara Murray, and Evan Perez report for CNN. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
The DPC commenced an inquiry to assess the legality of Meta’s EU-US transfers in the wake of the invalidation of the Privacy Shield in the 2020 Schr [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 25 March 2022 the European Union announced ‘agreement in principle’ with the United States on a new data transfer framework, intended to replace the Privacy Shield framework that was struck down in the 2020 Schrems II decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Privacy Shield Director Alex Greenstein, are on the “home stretch. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am
The Judgement Issue (i) The UKSC held that whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in the relevant information is a fact-specific enquiry.[5] In assessing whether Stage 1 was met, the UKSC referred to the “Murray factors”, identified in the CoA’s Murray v Express Newspapers plc decision.[6] These include: the attributes of the claimant, the nature of the activity in which the claimant was engaged, the place of the activity, the nature and… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 8 December 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Hwang v Kim [2021] EWHC 3327 (QB). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
On Monday 11 October 2021, the Labour Party named Seumas Milne, Karie Murphy, Georgie Robertson, Laura Murray and Harry Hayball as the individuals responsible for leaking the report entitled “The work of the Labour Party’s Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014-2019. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:03 pm
I focus on Hannah v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 5:09 am
Matthias Zigann of the court's 7th Civil Chamber took perfect precautions when I attended his Sharp v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet to win a Webby for the best News & Politics podcast series THE Q&A: “Rules of Procedure United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary,” Senate Judiciary Committee Oral Arguments in Judiciary Committee v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray and Leah Litman “recap the argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
The first case on the agenda is Kelly v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
Murray Rankin, stated during the debate on June 16, 2016, The safeguards in the bill reflect many things. [read post]
