Search for: "Short v. Mary et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In the first 1008 days of their respective terms as chair, the SEC passed 30 non-technical final rules under Jay Clayton, 24 under Mary Jo White, and 32 under Mary Schapiro. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Smith, et al., Case No. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Time and again, we see firms that have good policies, but fall short on implementation. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
& Leila Barraza et al., Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (forthcoming 2023) In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of cr [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The two standards involve overlapping factors, but in short raising a colorable claim of immunity (one of the requirements for removal) is a lower threshold than establishing actual immunity, i.e. to have the case dismissed (as discussed further below). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
& Mary L. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
One of the most remarkable, and objectionable, aspects of the third edition was its failure to engage with Federal Rule of Evidence of 703, and the need for courts to assess the validity of individual studies relied upon. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
We offer two definitions: a one-sentence definition that applies to all professions, and a more in-depth, but still short, definition for the legal profession. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
In this short essay, I don’t seek to answer those questions, but I do seek to uncover the significance of asking them. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
V. 2014. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In short, Ms. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Karen Bass et al. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Mike Shalabi, et al., CV219466MWFGJSX, 2022 WL 193967, at *6 (C.D. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Cases like Murdoch v Murdoch, [1975] 1 SCR 423, Rathwell v Rathwell, [1978] 2 SCR 436, Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834, and Sorochan v Sorochan, [1986] 2 SCR 38 worked their way to the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am
| Keeping up with Dutch patent litigation: Half-year case law review 2020 | Beijing IP Court: let’s talk about short video copyrights | Rick Ross wins legal beef with 50 Cent: the Second Circuit holds that 50 Cent's Publicity Right claim is preempted by the Copyright Act | Copyright, Trademark, International IP, and Trespass: Imapizza LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
NATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
