Search for: "Sierra v. Employment Appeal Bd." Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Trial Memo on Florida’s Workers’ Compensation “120-Day Rule”
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The key issue in the case is whether Florida’s “120-Day Rule” (F.S. 440.20(4)) will preclude the Employer/Carrier from denying the compensability of a number of claimant’s injuries and medical conditions. [read post]
Florida Injury Attorney Blawg - http://www.floridainjuryattorneyblawg.com/
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Trial Memo on the “120-Day Rule” and TPD Benefits
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
In Kestel v. [read post]
Florida Injury Attorney Blawg - http://www.floridainjuryattorneyblawg.com/
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Coastal Commission Out of Bounds with ESHA Determination
19 Feb 2008, 11:33 am
Security National Guaranty v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/