Search for: "Silverstein v Silverstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 3:42 am
The complaint contains no nonconclusory allegations suggesting that the purported negligence by defendants was the “but for” cause of the co-op sustaining actual damages (see Drasche v Edelman & Edelman, 201 AD3d 434, 435 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; Silverstein v Pillersdorf, 199 AD3d 539, 540 [1st Dept 2021]). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:21 am
Silverstein v Gregory 2023 NY Slip Op 31939(U) May 30, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151024/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm
As a NY estate lawyer with two decades of experience handling NY estates for New Yorkers I encounter… [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On the same day, Steyn J found in favour of the claimant in Soriano v Silverstein [2023] 2 WLUK 121. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Thus, the amended complaint does not sufficiently allege that “but for” defendants’ alleged negligence related to their failure to inform Albert of the terms and risks of the settlement documents, the settlement agreement would not have become effective and he would not have been damaged by it (Silverstein v Pillersdorf, 199 AD3d 539, 540 [1st Dept 2021]).Moreover, the amended complaint fails to allege that but for defendants’ negligence, the outcome of the… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
On 9 November 2022 there were hearings in the cases of Sharif v Associated Newspapers Limited and LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 5:18 am
It is no surprise that a pro-se litigant might face early dismissal as did plaintiff in Silverstein v Pillersdorf 2021 NY Slip Op 06461 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:44 am
But despite the landmark Somerset v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 4:22 am
HOUGHTS REGARDING BOSTOCK V. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
THOUGHTS REGARDING BOSTOCK V. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:26 am
THOUGHTS REGARDING BOSTOCK V. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:05 am
THOUGHTS REGARDING BOSTOCK V. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 10:05 am
THOUGHTS REGARDING BOSTOCK V. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
John Reed Stark As cybersecurity has become an increasingly important consideration for all corporate operations, one of the most pernicious problems has been the rise of so-called “ransomware” attacks – that is, systems breaches in which hackers take control of corporate networks and demand ransom payments as a condition of unlocking the systems. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
