Search for: "Simmons v Simmons" Results 1 - 20 of 1,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 11:15 am by Giles Peaker
General damages received the Simmons v Castle uplift, for a total of £16,303.09 Special damages of £17,687 were awarded in full. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:02 am by Ellena Erskine
EDT, the justices will hear oral argument in Moyle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am by Eleonora Rosati
Retro-KatsThere are still places available for the fifth annual Retromark conference, which returns for another afternoon of in-person trade mark law and practice hosted by Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat on Tuesday 7 May. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:03 am by Giles Peaker
The 10% Simmons v Castle uplift gave a total on general damages of £80,387.29 On the deposit protection, the landlord was ordered to replay the £1,100 deposit, and three times the deposit in respect of both the original tenancy, and when it became a statutory periodic, totalling £6,600. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The event, co-hosted by the IPKat, will be held at SimmonsSimmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Retro-KatsThe fifth annual Retromark conference returns for another afternoon of in-person trade mark law and practice hosted by Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat on Tuesday 7 May. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The doctrine applies “where the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action, and the party who is being estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier action” (Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, 112 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Molnar v JRL S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), holding death sentences for juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment; Miller v. [read post]