Search for: "Simmons v. Marshall" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2023, 8:00 am by Eleonora Rosati
RetroKatThe fourth annual Retromark conference returns for another afternoon of in-person trade mark law and practice hosted by Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat on Tuesday 2 May. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm by Eve Ross
Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall later acknowledged [Pauli Murray’s first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color] as his ‘bible’ in the historic Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
Katfriend Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons, London) provided the first report on the 63rd UIC John Marshall Law School Annual IP Conference, on the topic of "Antitrust & IP: Does it need to be retooled? [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  The DOJ intervened in the recent FTC v Qualcomm case (in which Judge Koh found in favour of the FTC) and now on appeal. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
  Together with special guest reporter Kats in the form of Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) and Alexander de Leeuw (Brinkhof), the IPKat will be covering another exciting program of challenging topics in IP covered by the glitterati of the IP field. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Just Liberty's latest "Reasonably Suspicious" podcast features discussions of important issues and fresh ideas confronting Texas' criminal justice system. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Monday’s decisions in Simmons v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled today in Simmons v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court also granted review of three other cases: a request to clarify when a lawsuit against federal officials is barred under the Federal Tort Claims Act because the same issue had been involved in an earlier lawsuit (Simmons v. [read post]