Search for: "Simpson v. Office of Human Rights" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
Stefan Theil, UK Human Rights Blog: Substantively orthodox: three takeaways from the ECHR climate change decisions: on the “the living instrument interpretative approach” in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland [2024] ECHR 304, which we noted briefly here. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am by LII Team
While this collection is in its infancy, some notable entries are the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Funeral Rule, right of disposition, and quasi property rights of a human body. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm by Aaron Moss
It isn’t human-readable and does not contain copies of any audio recordings. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Thirty-nine child safety and digital rights groups called on TikTok in particular to implement a global “Safety By Design” and “Children’s Rights by Design” approach. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the… [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Supreme Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
A few days after the shooting, Sawant told a crowd in front of the Seattle Police Department: "The brutal murder of Che Taylor, just a blatant murder at the hands of the police, show[s] how urgently we need to keep building our movement for basic human rights for black people and brown people. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 8:07 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on adverse effect discrimination has its roots in the 1985 decision in Ontario Human Rights Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Because I don’t… On the same day, the applicant and his ex-wife complained with the head office of the radio station, lamenting a violation of their right to respect for their private life, and claiming that A.M. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
The second covenant from 1933 is reproduced on the Human Rights History website here. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm by Rohit De
A German housemaid is clubbed to death on a Berlin street lined with families of British officers occupying former homes of wealthy Nazis. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
If that is right, Pelosi could not constitutionally “act as President,” even though the statute says she can. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
Simpson, Jim Jones, Ike Turner and, last but not least, Simon Cowell. [read post]