Search for: "Sinclair Publishing, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
An intervening act should be something “extraordinary or unusual” (see: R v Sinclair, 2009 MBCA 91 (CanLII)). [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am by Scott Hervey
Amazon.com Inc., now rejected by a number of courts. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:29 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, July 15, 2022 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of July 8-14, 2022. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:29 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, July 15, 2022 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of July 8-14, 2022. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
  From Judge Stephen Clark's opinion in Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Posted by , on Friday, July 24, 2020 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of July 17–23, 2020. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance & Financial Regulation, on Friday, January 24, 2020 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 17-23, 2020. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 11:48 am by FHH Law
The case began in November 2015 when someone using the pseudonym “Sinclair Upton” published a report alleging that Straight Path was able to get the FCC to renew the company’s 39 GHz band licenses by submitting filings incorrectly claiming that the company had actually constructed its 39 GHz systems. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 2:30 pm by FHH Law
The case began in November 2015 when someone using the pseudonym “Sinclair Upton” published a report alleging that Straight Path obtained FCC renewal of its 39 GHz band licenses by submitting filings claiming incorrectly that the company had built and presumably was operating systems that were actually not constructed. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 2:30 pm by FHH Law
The case began in November 2015 when someone using the pseudonym “Sinclair Upton” published a report alleging that Straight Path obtained FCC renewal of its 39 GHz band licenses by submitting filings claiming incorrectly that the company had built and presumably was operating systems that were actually not constructed. [read post]