Search for: "Sitz v. Sitz"
Results 1 - 20
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 11:39 am
Supreme Court has ruled that for DUI checkpoints to be constitutionally valid, certain rules must be followed: in Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
Sitz (496 U.S. 444). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
Sitz (1990): In this landmark case, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of DUI checkpoints. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:53 pm
Sitz In 1990, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Michigan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
Sitz. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:58 am
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 82, no. 3, 2022) is out. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:33 am
In Illinois v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 4:08 pm
Das Mr Bet Casino (Lizenz ausgestellt von Curaçao) gehört dem Unternehmen Faro Entertainment, einem recht kleinen Unternehmen mit Sitz in Malta. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:07 am
During the landmark case, Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:05 am
Contents include:Articles Deval Desai, Christopher Gevers, & Adil Hasan Khan, Sifting through the ‘successful failures’ and ‘failed successes’ of international law: introducing two essays on law and failure Vasuki Nesiah, Freedom at sea Adam Sitze, The crime of apartheid: genealogy of a successful failure Jamee K Moudud, A critical legal history of French banking and industrialisation: an alternative to the law and development framework Valeria… [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Sitz said (in a dissenting opinion, to be sure) that part of the constitutional analysis ought to have included an evaluation of whether the sobriety checkpoint is even effective. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 4:52 pm
In the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:36 pm
Sitz. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:36 am
Art. 19 Abs. 1 VÜPF). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 12:56 am
Brandenburgisches OLG, Beschl. v. 3. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am
Januar 2019 zu einer mündlichen Verhandlung in das Dienstgebäude der Beschwerdekammern nach Haar geladen hatte, Antrag auf Verlegung der Verhandlung nach München, da das Europäische Patentamt dort seinen Sitz habe, und Haar - anders als Den Haag - "im Europäischen Patentübereinkommen offensichtlich nicht als Ort für Handlungen oder Verhandlungen vorgesehen" ist.VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:20 am
Additional Resources: Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:48 pm
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 1:16 pm
In the case of Michigan v. [read post]
