Search for: "Smith v. Comm Social Security" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
He asserts that they are distinguishable because the expenditures objected to by the taxpayers in those cases—social security and national defense—are more compelling interests than that of abortion funding. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
In the past five years alone, we’ve watched the introduction of the tablet, the worldwide revolution in social media, the creation of an “app” economy, and the expansion of the Android operating system as the majority choice for mobile applications. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0426p.06  Ronald Madden v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 287, and unlawfully disclosing, using, and compelling the disclosure of Social Security account numbers of other persons in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]