Search for: "Smith v. Container General Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
AIs could, of course—and probably should—post disclaimers that stress the risk that their output will contain errors. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
The first is from the California Attorney General in Rupp v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm by admin
The third edition’s chapter on Survey Research contains the most explicit direction on Rule 703, in terms of courts’ responsibilities. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Nothing in the record on appeal permits this Court to depart from the assumption that juries generally follow explicit instructions: see R. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
But the focus is otherwise generally on the intent of the Congress that enacted the statute, not the actions of those who implement the statute afterward. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Walker, 234 N.W. 144, 147 (Mich. 1931); Wagner Electric Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The second edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence contained a chapter by the late Professor Margaret Berger, who took pains to point out the difference between agency assessments and the adjudication of causal claims in court: [p]roof of risk and proof of causation entail somewhat different questions because risk assessment frequently calls for a cost-benefit analysis. [read post]