Search for: "Smith v. David (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
(AMI)’s former CEO David Pecker, and others to influence the election by “identifying and purchasing negative information” about Trump “to suppress its publication and benefit” his “electoral prospects. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Using panel data and synthetic controls analyses, the study examined right-to-carry laws adopted in states between 1981 and 2007. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
ABC News had an article “There are two versions of the facts at Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
  The parties to a case don’t have the general right to listen to or obtain a copy of the actual recording of a hearing and they are prohibited from making their own unless the judge gives permission (s9 Contempt of Court Act 1981). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]