Search for: "Smith v. Division of Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Following an investigation by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, the Commission institutes an administrative proceeding and finds that because of the mutual conflict of interest created by the audit firm’s provision of non-audit services at reduced rates in exchange for being chosen as the company’s auditor, the audit firm and audit partner were not independent within the meaning of Rule 2-01(b) of Regulation S-X. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Boards and commissions continue to be allowed to exhibit strong, quasi-judicial powers, in spite of their administrative agency character. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In a few moments, my Enforcement Division colleagues will talk to you about the “what” of our work — in other words, the issues that are top of mind for us. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
See Grant v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
On Jan. 10, the justices will hear Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Matter of Smith v City of Norwich, 205 AD3d 140 the Appellate Division held that in the event an administrative determination is made where an evidentiary hearing is not required by law, court review is limited to whether the administrative determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Matter of Smith v City of Norwich, 205 AD3d 140 the Appellate Division held that in the event an administrative determination is made where an evidentiary hearing is not required by law, court review is limited to whether the administrative determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Rohl, Ray Smith, and L. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
He challenged that action, an administrative judge rejected his challenge, and the MSPB affirmed. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Smith of the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Trump Appointee Sentenced to Nearly 6 Years for Attacking Police on Jan. 6 MSN – Rachel Weiner and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 11/3/2023 A Trump appointee to the State Department who assaulted multiple police officers at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was sentenced to nearly six years in prison by a fellow veteran of the administration. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Smith. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Neither issue produced enough urgency for Republicans to quickly elect a speaker as many had hoped, again highlighting the conference’s deep divisions. [read post]
