Search for: "Smith v. Florida"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,093
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
One federal appeals court in Atlanta sided with the companies and against Florida. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Florida and Moore v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Florida permitting the use of six-person juries in felony cases “turned its back on the original meaning of the Constitution, centuries of historical practice, and a battery of this court’s precedents. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
W. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
Smith, 130 So. 440 (Fla. 1930)). [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Lucia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Smith, 23-167 Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
Trump v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
This is as true of the acts Smith has taken in the Florida classified documents case, against Donald Trump, under the eye of the 11th Circuit, as it is of the actions Smith has taken in the D.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
In one case, State of Florida v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
First up is Garland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Florida charted a different path. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
As Adam Smith recognized in The Theory of the Moral Sentiments, business as an institution depends on certain basic moral principles and understandings.[15] Even in his more famous and influential The Wealth of Nations,[16] Smith recognized that promoting excessively “high profits” for capitalists could undermine the economic wealth and moral well-being of a nation as a whole.[17] In my article, I draw also on the contemporary social philosopher Axel Honneth, who… [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 11:38 am
Florida and Moore v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
" Lucia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:37 am
Earth, Wind & Fire IP, LLC v. [read post]