Search for: "Smith v. State Parole Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 10:51 am
Smith, issued on October 12. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
Six days later, the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board deadlocked 2-2, declining to recommend clemency. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that the board members blocking constituents on Facebook and Twitter constituted state action. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am
On Wednesday 5th April the Court will hand-down judgment in R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2023] UKSC 13. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Following the outrage, a number of changes have already been made to the parole board system and boards are now obliged to publish the reasoning behind their decisions and grant victims the right to challenge release decisions on violent offenders. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:04 am
Alabama, where the Court held that juvenile defendants could not be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole and Montgomery v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
The cases scheduled for argument during the November session are below: United States Fish & Wildlife Service v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
In addition to Tarrant, the three other counties responsible for death sentences were Harris, Smith, Tarrant and Upton. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:26 am
A copy of the Michigan case, Smith v Macomb County Concealed Weapons Board, No 323696 2016 is available here. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:26 am
A copy of the Michigan case, Smith v Macomb County Concealed Weapons Board, No 323696 2016 is available here. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
Although he became eligible for discretionary parole in 2002, he never sought a hearing before the parole board. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 18-5232, Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
