Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)"
Results 1 - 20
of 597
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
” Due to Justice Department practices, Pearce would not put on the record whether the history-making federal indictment of a former U.S. president amounted to a “significant event. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
Department of Commerce. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Smith is a mere employee of the Department of Justice, and he lacks the power to initiate prosecutions. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
562, Decision No. 14,311; Appeal of Smith, Jr., 34 id. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
562, Decision No. 14,311; Appeal of Smith, Jr., 34 id. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Justice Kavanaugh also said that Morrison v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Dreeben is wearing an ordinary business suit, and not the morning coat usually worn by male lawyers for the federal government, though later, in questioning, he will tell the justices, “I am speaking on behalf of the Justice Department. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
(William Hennessy) Dreeben contended that, even if presidents have immunity for their official acts, in this case the federal government could still introduce evidence of Trump’s interactions with the Department of Justice. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
Trump has filed multiple motions designed to delay the trial until past the November election, after which, if he wins the election, he is expected to instruct the Justice Department to drop the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
After Chutkan denied that request in December, it was Smith who came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s claim to immunity without waiting for the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
(William Hennessy) Arguing on behalf of the Department of Justice, U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
The government appealed to the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: This article addresses the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 756 (1982) (quoting Barr v. [read post]
