Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)" Results 1 - 20 of 596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Smith is a mere employee of the Department of Justice, and he lacks the power to initiate prosecutions. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Dreeben is wearing an ordinary business suit, and not the morning coat usually worn by male lawyers for the federal government, though later, in questioning, he will tell the justices, “I am speaking on behalf of the Justice Department. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Dreeben contended that, even if presidents have immunity for their official acts, in this case the federal government could still introduce evidence of Trump’s interactions with the Department of Justice. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Fred Wertheimer
Trump has filed multiple motions designed to delay the trial until past the November election, after which, if he wins the election, he is expected to instruct the Justice Department to drop the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
After Chutkan denied that request in December, it was Smith who came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s claim to immunity without waiting for the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Arguing on behalf of the Department of Justice, U.S. [read post]