Search for: "Smith v. USPS - United States Post Office" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2020, 12:01 pm by Wally Zimolong
County of Erie Tax Claim Bureau, 59 A.3d 50, 55 (Pa.Cmwlth.2013) (citations omitted); Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Patent and Trademark Office under a 2011 federal statute, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm by Erik Slobe
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
The fact that you get thrown out of the United States forever because the USPS messed up is, well, tough.But Judge Kleinfeld's dissent is a perfect example of a different type of reasoning; in a way, a different type of judging. [read post]