Search for: "Smith v. Vice"
Results 1 - 20
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Lucia v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
2000 In 2000, the presidential election between Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, was appointed a Special Counsel to prosecute wrongdoing in the District of Columbia by Scooter Libby, then-Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
And impeachment was strictly confined to: "civil officers of the United States" as well as the President and Vice President. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
He didn't invoke Smith or Mouat or Free Enterprise Fund. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
