Search for: "Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Kho, the Supreme Court has agreed to decide these issues: “(1) Was the arbitration remedy at issue in this case sufficiently affordable and accessible within the meaning of Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Valencia Holding Co., LLC, 201 Cal.App.4th 74 (2011)), and the question was since authoritatively answered in the negative in several opinions, including Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The district court rejected the plaintiffs’ assertion that the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sonic Calabasas A., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 2:07 pm by Sarah Cole
Supreme Court today let stand a California Supreme Court decision that a lower court may consider whether a waiver of any state administrative wage hearing makes an arbitration agreement unconscionable and thus unenforceable, denying an auto dealer’s petition to review the case ( Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:09 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
and pointedly arguing that Gentry's sole focus was the class action waiver within the arbitration provision -- falling squarely within Concepcion, while Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Only a few months after Italian Colors, the California Supreme Court got its first major chance to address the new landscape in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Join us back here soon for Part 2 of the legal backdrop - Italian Colors, Sonic-Calabasas and the Court of Appeal's decision in Iskanian. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  On February 26, 2014, the Court requested a response from the respondent, Moreno, in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
In formulating the standard for determining whether a contract or contract term is substantively unconscionable, this court has used a variety of terms, including "unreasonably favorable" to one party (Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]