Search for: "South Carolina v. Harrison" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court of South Carolina discussed this fact pattern in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
Providing party-specific relief in the Fourth Circuit effectively vacates the agency action in Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, but does not necessarily have any effect in the rest of the country, unless the agency opts to acquiesce–or a party successfully petitions for express nationwide relief. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
It also includes the writings of such originalist scholars as well as Nathaniel Chapman, John Harrison, Kurt Lash, Michael McConnell, Ryan Williams, and Ilan Wurman. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
, Megan Richardson University of Melbourne – Law School, Barbara McDonald, The University of Sydney Law School, Normann Witzleb Monash University – Faculty of Law, David Vaile University of New South Wales (UNSW) – Faculty of Law; Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre, Graham Greenleaf University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  South Carolina, for example, passed a law in 1882 that required all potential voters to re-register, but delegated to election administrators broad discretion in determining voting eligibility. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm by Harold O'Grady
The remaining electoral votes were in dispute over voter fraud, mostly in three Southern states with Reconstruction governments: Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am by John Rubin
State, 667 S.E.2d 605, 608 (Ga. 2008); Guenther, 740 P.2d at 981; see also Harrison v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am by John Rubin
State, 667 S.E.2d 605, 608 (Ga. 2008); Guenther, 740 P.2d at 981; see also Harrison v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am by Taylor Daily
In a notable segment which echoed the words of South Carolina Party Chair Jaime Harrison, Cuomo stated that the Republican argument of wanting to “take us back to the old days, the good old days” would take us back to a time “before the Civil Rights Act … before minimum wage and worker protection laws … before Roe v. [read post]