Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
6/23/1987: South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
6/23/1987: South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
6/23/1987: South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:36 am
Given the space limitations of a newspaper op-ed page, it is perhaps understandable that the discussion does not quite persuasively distinguish the 7-2 South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
The two alcohol-related cases most firmly established in the canon and reproduced in whole or in part in virtually every Con Law casebook are South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
The question squarely presented in that grant is whether the Medicaid expansion that is part of the optimistically named "Affordable Care Act" is void because it is coercive, under the framework established by South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
McClung (1964) South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
The Court relied on, seemingly modified, and strengthened at least two existing elements of the test for conditional spending articulated in South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
Constitution sheds very little light on decisions like South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm
Here is the abstract: The Spending Clause has been interpreted to grant extremely broad discretion for Congress to offer conditional grants to the states - most recently in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
This strikes me as a fairly reasonable gloss on the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
When Chief Justice Rehnquist authored South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:25 am
Another answer, following South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
Dole and New York v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Davis (1937) and South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
South Dakota v Dole held that the Congress could demand that states raise their drinking age as a condition for receiving federal highway funds. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
North Carolina).It is definitely worth debating these issues on the merits, especially in the unique context of the Spending Clause, where, in my view, there is a fairly strong argument that (so long as the regulation survives South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
