Search for: "Speaks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
In West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
To qualify for ADR, a TRS member must show that their disability resulted from an "accident" sustained in the performance of their duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [f]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 13-551). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
To qualify for ADR, a TRS member must show that their disability resulted from an "accident" sustained in the performance of their duties (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [f]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 13-551). [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Surveillance On 15 May 2024, a London Administrative Court handed down its judgment in the case of ADL & Ors v SSHD [2024] EWHC 994 (Admin). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
From Pryor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
(and global) security. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
” The court concluded that these types of statements “undoubtedly risk impeding the orderly administration” of the court, with no less restrictive means to guard against that risk short of a limited gag order. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
A public official’s social media activity constituted state action under §1983 only if the official both (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the state’s behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when speaking on social media. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The transformation becomes decisive as language, standards, and operations become opaque to non-specialists and extra-administrative accountability weakens. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” Congress may not, the Court has announced, empower an administrative agency to take on an important problem unless Congress speaks super clearly, and also super precisely. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
In the case, a group of social media users, along with Louisiana and Missouri, sued the Biden administration in July 2023. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
This is a moment to speak the truth and to bury the lies. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
Biden—now Murthy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Brandeis agreed with Holmes that courts should rarely invalidate social and economic legislation under the Fourteenth Amendment, but for very different reasons. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
And it is here that the current apparatus--its Leninist vanguard and its administrative nomenklatura--fail to live up to the promise of its discourse. [read post]
