Search for: "Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2012, 9:45 am
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:06 am
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2001): “whether the contractual terms were ‘reasonably conspicuous’ and whether Mr. [read post]
Legal rules, convenient fictions, and figuring out when you've agreed to something you haven't read.
14 Sep 2009, 7:26 am
Netscape Communications Corp. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 6:34 pm
Netscape Communs. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
Netscape Communications Corp. , "where 'submerged' website provisions were found insufficient to bind the company's customers. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
Netscape Communications Corp., "where 'submerged' website provisions were found insufficient to bind the company's customers. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:02 pm
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002), in which the Second Circuit had rejected an arbitration clause in a terms of use agreement for inadequate notice. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:51 am
The Court of Appeals in Specht v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:51 am
The Court of Appeals in Specht v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
Specht v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:43 pm
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002) (declining to enforce an arbitration provision contained in a software licensing browsewrap agreement where the hyperlink to the agreement appeared on “a submerged screen” below the “Download” button that the plaintiffs clicked to initiate the download). [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
RRL Corp. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 261, 270 (Donovan) [“An essential element of any contract is the consent of the parties. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:01 pm
As NFTs became more popular in 2021, there was a groundswell of vocal pushback to this concept from the NFT community. [read post]
