Search for: "Specialty Communication System, Inc., in Re"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 4:17 am
Access to the proprietary results will also equip contributors with data to optimize salaries and foster crucial pay transparency in traditionally opaque legal tech specialties. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Originally, through the court’s decision in In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
18 May 2023, 3:25 am
It celebrated the continued growth of its EMEA e-discovery community, the launch of the Justice for Change program in EMEA, and the appointment of a new EMEA leader. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am
App. 2013 (mentioning Kramer as plaintiffs’ expert witness); In re Chan [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), legal scholars, judges, and lawyers have struggled with the structure and validity of expert opinion on specific causation. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
To assess medical care, [investigators] utilized medical experts from the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC) Resources, Inc. 12 to conduct a virtual tour of the ICDC medical unit and medical records review. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir. 1990); cf. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD (CRB) In re DOCKET NO. 21-CRB-0001-PR-(2023-2027) Making and Distributing Phonorecords (Phonorecords IV) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking re: 37 C.F.R. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
Malady (opinion here) and Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am
”Solvay Specialty Polymers/ArkemaArkema, Inc., of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, produced chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) refrigerant gases at the Gloucester County site in the 1970s and in the 1980s manufactured industrial plastics and coatings using PFAS compounds. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm
David TopolPrivate investments funds (hedge funds, PE firms, venture capital funds and the like) are a significant part of the U.S. economy. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 5:14 pm
JHS operates six major hospitals, a network of urgent care centers, multiple primary care and specialty care centers, long-term care nursing facilities, and corrections health services clinics, provides health services to approximately 650,000 patients annually, and employs about 12,000 individuals. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm
;Communication, education and training on compliance;Monitoring, auditing and internal reporting systems;Enforcing standards through well-publicized disciplinary guidelines;Responding promptly to detected offenses and undertaking corrective action;Urogynecology and OB/GYN practices should also conduct an organization-specific review in order to identify and address any regulatory risks that may be present. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm
;Communication, education and training on compliance;Monitoring, auditing and internal reporting systems;Enforcing standards through well-publicized disciplinary guidelines;Responding promptly to detected offenses and undertaking corrective action;Urogynecology and OB / GYN practices should also conduct an organization-specific review in order to identify and address any regulatory risks that may be present. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:27 pm
See Internet Specialties W., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:09 am
Under Specialty Healthcare, the union had the initial burden to show that the employees in the micro unit shared a basic community of interest. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:09 am
Under Specialty Healthcare, the union had the initial burden to show that the employees in the micro unit shared a basic community of interest. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
At the taxpayer’s place of employment, if the IRS knows or has reason to know that such communication is prohibited. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
As part of the package of remedies imposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau upon the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts and their debt collector, TransWorld Systems, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
