Search for: "Stanford v. Doe et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
This issue was discussed by Justice Breyer in his Stanford v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Research Methodology Much of the data and analysis presented in the article by Barrero et al., are taken from the authors’ own study, the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
As we read the brief, the Amars have retreated from the central position they put forward in an influential 1995 Stanford Law Review article. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
We have an algorithm and it does "XYZ. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
A firm implementing its own AI system does not guarantee victory. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Among the most authoritative sources cherry-picked by the AGs is a well-regarded Stanford Law Review article by Schanzenbach and Sitkoff.[6] As the Kentucky AG notes when citing this piece of scholarship, “ESG investing is an ‘umbrella term that refers to an investment strategy that emphasizes a firm’s governance structure or the environmental or social impacts of the firm’s products or practices. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
As I argue in a forthcoming article in the Stanford Journal of International Law, the loss of habitable territory will have drastic implications for the populations at risk of displacement as well as the traditional conception of statehood under international law, which is commonly understood to possess a territory, permanent population, and a government with “a sufficient degree of independence in international relations. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
By Laura Dowdy Introduction On December 31st, each year, new creative works enter the public domain. [1] This means that while some artists/creators lose the right to preclude others from copying a work, others can create new works that utilize aspects of previously copyrighted works. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Such is the teaching of the First District Court of Appeal’s December 28, 2022 published opinion in Charles Jenkins et al v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
Arkansas Times LP v Mark Waldrip, et al, No. 19-1378 (8th Circuit, 2022). [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Ablavsky is a law professor at Stanford. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
”[11] For Gelbach, this “eminently reasonable admonition” does not impose any constraints on statistical inference in the courtroom. [read post]
