Search for: "Starr International Co. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
” The wrong turn came in the next case, Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
City of San Diego (”UMMP”) (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 (my post on which can be found here) and Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
(Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
United States: The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 12:13 pm
Circuit 2011) (dissent) El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The United States has addressed this question six times in both internal memos and briefs filed in litigation. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
” Additional coverage of the cert denial in Starr International Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co., 2017 U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
United States A Haiti orphanage founder and a U.S. charity have been awarded more than $14 million combined in damages, after a Maine activist who publicised sexual abuse allegations against them was found guilty of defamation. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
’” (Citing Great Oaks Water Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
Starr, Sanfor (Sandy) Svetcov, Hon. [read post]