Search for: "State v. CH" Results 1 - 20 of 3,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am by David Pocklington
The decision of Joanna Smith J. in Frain & McKinnon v Reeves & Curnock [2023] EWHC 73 (Ch) (at 19), was cited with approval, from which the following relevant principles could be distilled: a. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
With regard to the retrospective faculties/illegal actions, Humphreys Ch. said: [96]. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Individual Rights and Socioeconomic Benefits (Foreword to: Jean-Yves Carlier, Marie-Claire Foblets, Law and Migration in a Changing World, General Report of the 2014 Viena Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, Basel (CH): Springer International Publishers, 2022, pp v-xii) on SSRN. [read post]