Search for: "State v. Early" Results 1 - 20 of 18,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Allison Roda points out that "the City has never demonstrated that either its previous or current evaluation system—or, more generally, its early tracking of students into G&T versus general education programs—is pedagogically sound. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Allison Roda points out that "the City has never demonstrated that either its previous or current evaluation system—or, more generally, its early tracking of students into G&T versus general education programs—is pedagogically sound. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
The “dedication” of the Department to charging these administrative concealment penalties became obvious from testimony during various hearings in 2022 and early 2023, when Department program integrity staffers revealed that the Department applied the 40% administrative concealment penalties as early as December 2020 to Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (“PUA”) benefits. [read post]