Search for: "State v. Flower"
Results 1 - 20
of 839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
The case is entitled Ash v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
In June 2023, in 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Letting 1,000 flowers bloom on the fifty State Supreme Courts, as to presidential eligibility requirements, is more likely to produce a weed garden than it is the Rose Garden.The post Trump v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:56 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
I guess we’ll know more when the flowers start to bloom in the spring. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
Canales v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
” Flowers Foods had argued that there is no split in the circuits, that the Supreme Court in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
