Search for: "State v. Harvey" Results 1 - 20 of 839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The issue in the appeal was whether a foreign state whose agents remotely install spyware on claimants in the UK, causing psychiatric injury to those being spied upon, is entitled to immunity from civil proceedings within the meaning of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am by INFORRM
United States Amended versions of the proposed Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act — also known as COPPA 2.0 — and the Kids Online Safety Act were approved for House f [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 30 July 2024 there was a statement in open court in the case of Singh v Cartland and a return date hearing the case of Synnovis Services v Persons Unknown. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection DLA Piper has an article on the state of play of the data-sharing frameworks in the EU and UK. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
Last updated: 07/31/2022 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
Harvey has now said she intends to take legal action against Gadd and possibly Netflix, though no claim has yet been issued. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
In the midst of Trump’s trial, New York’s highest court made clear the danger of allowing too much salacious evidence into trial – by overturning the state’s convictions of disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein on that basis. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am sure many readers were as surprised as I was by the news last week that the New York Court of Appeals had overturned the disgraced former movie producer Harvey Weinstein’s sexual misconduct-related criminal convictions, apparently due  to evidentiary decisions the trial court made. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]