Search for: "State v. Nicholson"
Results 1 - 20
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:06 am
The press release further stated that in the course of the investigation, the board had learned that the Chair of the company’s board of directors, David Nicholson, had “prior knowledge of the existence of the earlier of Dr. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” Nicholson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:18 pm
E.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:45 am
In Davidson v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:48 am
Myriddian comes on the heels of the CFC’s recent decision in Thalle/Nicholson Joint Venture v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360 established five criteria for what constitutes a protected belief for the purposes of section 10 (Religion or belief) of the Equality Act 2010, as follows: The belief must be genuinely held; It must be a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available; It must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour; It must attain a certain level of cogency,… [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
Nicholson J found that the defendants had satisfied the onus of establishing that the claims against them related to matters in the public interest, thus meeting the anti-SLAPP threshold. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 11:24 am
” Reynolds v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
Nicholson (Notice; Child Custody) Barreto v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:01 am
See Nicholson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am
In Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4, Burton J had set out the constituent elements of a “protected belief” under section 10 at [24]: the belief must be honestly held, it must be a belief as distinct from an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available, it must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour, it must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance and must… [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 11:15 pm
At a preliminary hearing to determine whether her belief was protected by s.10 Equality Act 2010, the initial Employment Tribunal held that her belief was “not worthy of respect in a democratic society” and, therefore, failed the fifth criterion established in Grainger plc v Nicholson [2009] UKEAT 0219 09 0311. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 7:29 am
Under the United States Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that… [read post]
