Search for: "State Board of Corrections v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
Susan V. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Smith was abrogated by Trentadue v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
The Court of Appeal considered the correct approach to plausibility and in doing so interpreted the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
A contextual example of Appellant's reliance on fictitious authority includes: For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Therefore, even if Chief Justice Chase had held in Griffin’s Case, as Trump asserts, that “congressional enforcement legislation [is] the exclusive means for enforcing section 3” (Chase didn’t do so), and even if that proposition were correct (it’s not) or if Chase were right about what he did hold about the inability of courts to enforce Section 3 against someone already in office (he wasn’t), that still would not require… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Smith v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Rohl, Ray Smith, and L. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Smith. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
§ 7703(b)(1)(A), which provides that “[a] petition from a final decision shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the Board. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
Smith on July 18, 2023. [read post]
