Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Court explained that the first statement “is state action taken in his official capacity as school board president;” while “the latter is private action taken in his personal capacity as a friend and neighbor. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Department of State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
The Court stressed that its decision in Brewer v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
In Chaudhry v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Following critiques by some that the disclosure requirements embedded in these practice directions were too vague and potentially an overreach (see, e.g. here and here), some other Canadian courts – including the Superior Court of Quebec and three Alberta courts collectively – opted to simply caution the profession and parties about AI use rather than create new disclosure mandates. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:04 pm
V, § 11 (3). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
Each Member State had to be given a margin of discretion in how it promoted the neutrality of the public service in the workplace [33] – and Directive 2000/78 only established a general framework for equal treatment in employment, which left a margin of discretion to the Member States and to their infra-State bodies [34]. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am
Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Arizona – Two Groups Making New Bid to Hide Names of Donors in Political Races Arizona Capitol Times – Howard Fischer (Capitol News Services) | Published: 11/7/2023 Attorney Scott Freeman acknowledges that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott McCoy rejected his bid to void Proposition 211. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Under compulsion of State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) orders to cease and remediate its decades-long overuse of other water sources (including the Carmel River system and Seaside Basin), ultimately by the end of 2021, Cal-Am began pursuing its Water Supply Project in 2012. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
After an Alameda County Superior Court ruling [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
In fact, Australia’s High Court stated that deference on interpretive questions was nothing less than an “abdication of judicial responsibility” (in a case considering Chevron in obiter). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In fact, Australia’s High Court stated that deference on interpretive questions was nothing less than an “abdication of judicial responsibility” (in a case considering Chevron in obiter). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:58 am
The California Supreme Court in LeBouef v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]