Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. T. S.-t., Appellant" Results 1 - 20 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm by Phil Dixon
We’ve repeatedly stated that potential innocent explanations don’t defeat probable cause. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am by Reference Staff
” The rule number was changed from GR 36 to GR 37 during the adoption process.Other states have also responded to the challenge. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
The appellant, a barrister and founding member of the Liberal Democrats, sought an order against the respondents requiring them to identify the identities of people who had made anonymous complaints against her to the political party. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Josh Blackman
David McKnight's influential treatise observed that "[i]t is obvious that . . . the President is not regarded as 'an officer of, or under, the United States,' but as one branch of 'the Government.'" In Mississippi v. [read post]