Search for: "State ex rel. State v. Lewis" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
T., a Child (Indian Child Welfare Act) State ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am by Rebecca M. Guidry
Caremark, Inc., 584 F.3d 655, 658 (5th Cir. 2009) (citing McCarthy ex rel. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:59 am by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html State ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Paul Stern
If compensating injured parties was the sole purpose of constitutional tort law, the rationale would best be effectuated through a remedial regime akin to what Justice Lewis Powell referred to as strict liability in Owens v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]