Search for: "State ex rel. v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
 CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Circuit split and dissent The Ninth Circuit created a circuit spilt with the Seventh Circuit’s 2022 decision in Seafarers Pension Plan ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We know that the original electorate was remarkably restricted at the time, even if it would become more inclusive relatively early in the 19th century. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]