Search for: "State of Florida Department of Revenue v. Gonzalez"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) (here). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
And he falsely reported to the Florida Department of Children and Families that Couture had harmed her child. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
Montana Dept. of Revenue, involving state constitution prohibitions on state aid to "sectarian" institutions, explained that in the 19th century, "sectarian" was not a synonym for "religious. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, and STEFFANIE DANIELLE CACCIATORE, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:58 am
Attorney’s Office Southern District of Florida on July 14, 2011 released the following: “INTERNATIONAL DRUG MONEY LAUNDERING INDICTMENT UNSEALED Wifredo Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and John V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
" Another Justice joined in the judgment, opining that revenue which a gambling business uses to pay essential operating expenses is not "proceeds" under the statute. . [read post]