Search for: "State of Ga. v. Hudson"
Results 1 - 20
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Rather, they are a coordinated step in a multi-year strategy to undermine criticism of the oil and gas industries. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” Id. at ___; 892 S.E.2d at 863 (citing Hudson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:16 am
Since Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 5:34 pm
Ga. 1988). [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
In 2020, following a long-term investigation into an individual’s cigarette smuggling activity, a process including court-authorized search warrants, wiretaps, grand jury subpoenas, and other investigative tools, New York seized more than $1.3 million in cash and 6,267 cartons of untaxed cigarettes, according to a press release from the Queens’ District Attorney.[2] But even law enforcement successes are costly and only stop a drop of water in the Hudson River of smuggling… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 pm
The Court applied the four-prong intermediate scrutiny test set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel or the intermediate standard set by Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:27 pm
First, the Maine law regulates commercial speech, which the Supreme Court has described as “expression related solely to the economic interests of the speaker and its audience,” in an opinion called Central Hudson Gas v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 483 (1989); see also Central Hudson Gas & Elec. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" 825 S.E.2d 601, 606 (Ga. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:04 am
Section 2(a)’s immoral-or-scandalous-marks provision fails to satisfy even the “intermediate scrutiny” applied to commercial speech under Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
