Search for: "State of Iowa v. Brown"
Results 1 - 20
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Ferguson, and Brown v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm
Kelly (10th Cir. 2021), and Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
A Connecticut appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Compensation Review Board that affirmed a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commissioner dismissing a former employee’s claim for benefits related to injuries sustained when the former employee lit the wick of a small brown sphere and it exploded. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Senate contests like Sherrod Brown’s in Ohio and Jon Tester’s in Montana. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:28 am
Brennan, writing in the January 1977 Harvard Law Review, had been part of the liberal Warren Court era, a period marked by Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
An Iowa judge agreed. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As in the years after Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Brown, who also granted a preliminary injunction, in March, to block the rule from being implemented in two other states, Texas and Idaho. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Brown, who also granted a preliminary injunction, in March, to block the rule from being implemented in two other states, Texas and Idaho. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Brown, who also granted a preliminary injunction, in March, to block the rule from being implemented in two other states, Texas and Idaho. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
The law of some states seems to reject this theory, see, e.g., Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Shortly after, Iowa changed its statute and became the first state in the Union to allow women to practice law. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Shortly after, Iowa changed its statute and became the first state in the Union to allow women to practice law. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
Brown v. [read post]
