Search for: "State of Louisiana In The Interest of J. W., III" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
L. 2023 HB618 – Still No Taking All the Credit for Taxes Paid to Other States Restrictions on the availability of a credit for net income taxes paid in another state have been extended – (i) the credit is limited to the amount of Louisiana income tax that would have been imposed if the income earned in the other state had been earned in Louisiana, (ii) the credit is not allowed for tax paid on income that is not subject to tax in… [read post]
Its only business activity consisted of holding its interest in Davis-Lynch, LLC (“D-L LLC”), a Texas single-member limited liability company authorized to do business in Louisiana and that was disregarded for federal and state income tax purposes. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
  Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (3), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider, supplier or any owner or managing employee was convicted of a Federal or State felony (within the preceding 10 years) that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider, supplier or any owner or managing employee was convicted of a Federal or State felony (within the preceding 10 years) that CMS determines is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 12:28 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Kathleen Moore, National Institutes of Health;Belinda Newman, University of North Texas [retired in 2018, but not previously announced];Jackie Osborne, Chevron Corporation;Lee Potts, University of Colorado, Boulder;Lee Twyman; Rochester Institute of Technology; andElaine Wynn, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Passings -- Colleagues remembered several Ombuds who passed:Toshio Akamine, Washington State University;Thomas W. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
NantKwest, Inc. is the successor-in-interest as an assignee of its predecessor-in-interest’s application for a patent for a method of treating cancer cells, which was rejected for being obvious and thus not patentable. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
If an attorney or law firm has procured clients through marketing efforts that run afoul of the barratry statute, it would be in its interest to have the issued resolved in a private forum, and not create a public record, but does that advance the state's public policy? [read post]