Search for: "State of Texas, et al. v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
EPA, 573 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Instead, FOIAonline was a consolidated starting point, managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), that let you file Freedom of Information Act requests with numerous federal entities from within a single digital interface. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
EPA. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
(Federal Recognition; Tribal Court Judgment) Greene, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Williamson, et al., 1 Bankrupt. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Alyson Outenreath was reappointed to the following positions: State Bar of Texas Tax Section Past Chair Advisory Board; State Bar of Texas Tax Section Council, Law School Representative; State Bar of Texas Tax Section, Law School Outreach Co-Chair; and State Bar of [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
" Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit would decide Texas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Cavender State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Robert Sherwin’s article Ambiguity in Anti-SLAPP Law and Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: George Wyeth et al., The Impact of Citizen Environmental Science in the United States, 49 ELR 10237 (2019). 5. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
” Texas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017) 11/28/2017 11 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kel [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:04 am
Facts: This case (Graham et al v. [read post]
