Search for: "State v. 119 Vote No! Committee"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
Reports state that calm has since been restored to the area. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
Unlike the state supreme court decision in Rickert v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Gore (stopping state recount of votes for President), and Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
The bill easily passed the House with a vote of 378-48 in April 2017 but stalled in the Senate Rules Committee. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
The discipline involved Groia’s defence in R. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPOMerpel growls in disappointment at the dismissal of Laurent Prunier, Secretary of SUEPO The Hague and member of the EPO’s Central Staff Committee. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
In King v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
The Court will leave the political debate about those differences to others; a vote of the people on that will be taken on November 6. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Public Disclosure Comm’n v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Public Disclosure Comm’n v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:55 pm
Disclosure Comm’n v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the complete text of Hamilton v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
The Board unanimously approved the merger and more than 95% of the shares were voted in favor of the deal. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
Much of this furor stems from the outrageous decision issued by the Supreme Court in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Additionally, if the proposal was included in the proxy statement, the board would have had an opportunity to state its reasons for opposition. [read post]