Search for: "State v. A. C." Results 1 - 20 of 39,649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
For example, Question 2(c) asks whether serial acquisitions encourage “actual or attempted coordination or collusion between competitors” and Question 3 posits nine subparts about ways in which an acquirer might harm competition, including tying and refusals to deal. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Howard Bashman
“The Twisted Career of the term ‘Liberty Interest’ Gets Twistier Still in Dep’t of State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 12:02 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The Court held that the evidence did not establish genuine use for ‘chicken sandwiches,’ but did establish partial use that was sufficient to maintain the category of ‘food prepared from meat products’.Alessandro Cerri commented on the CJEU decision (Joined Cases C‑662/22 and C‑667/22) on the country-of-origin principle, which clarified that information service providers are only subject to regulation by their home Member State. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:49 am by Marcia Coyle
There appeared to be a sense of that in the 8-1 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]