Search for: "State v. Amend"
Results 1 - 20
of 61,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am
In addition, it analyses how the Brussels IIb Regulation optimises the provisions of the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction between the member states of the European Union. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am
ShareJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion for a unanimous court Thursday in Cantero v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am
If Buckley v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:22 pm
The Court has also allowed 1226(c) to permit prolonged detentions in Jennings v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
From Steinbuch v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Without representation from an attorney, Granier filed his own petition for review from the state prison in Angola, Louisiana, arguing, in Granier v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:57 am
The name “Miranda” came from the landmark United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:01 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
(Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:51 am
In the 2012 United States Supreme Court case National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
United StatesLindke v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am
While the Rome Statute was amended in 2019 to incorporate starvation as a war crime in NIACs (Article 8(2)(e)(xix)), Palestine has not ratified the amendment. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:15 am
Trump v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 8:48 pm
Vullo, another First Amendment case with allegations of improper motivation. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:36 pm
Justice Sotomayor expanded on the decision in Bantam Books, Inc., which stated the First Amendment does not permit government officials to use the “threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion…to achieve the suppression [of disfavored speech]. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] My Identifying Would-Be Jane Doe Litigant in Law Review Article Wasn't "Harassment,"
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm
From Luo v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:50 pm
Applying the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
-EV] Those allegations, if true, state a First Amendment claim…. [read post]
